|
Post by soniktruth on Feb 22, 2005 4:12:59 GMT -5
these (so called) "critics" gave these bands albums these ratings
Chris Dahlen Dredg El Cielo [Interscope; 2002] Rating: 5.6
Brent DiCrescenzo The Mars Volta De-Loused in the Comatorium [Strummer/Universal; 2003] Rating: 4.9
Brent DiCrescenzo Sonic Youth NYC Ghosts & Flowers [Geffen; 2000] Rating: 0.0 (it kinda sucked but not that bad{nevermind(what was it anyway}{stream x sonik subway}))
-Brent DiCrescenzo Tool Lateralus [Volcano] Rating: 1.9
Camilo Arturo Leslie
Samiam Astray [Hopeless] Rating: 3.8
Ryan Schreiber Rage Against the Machine Evil Empire [Epic; 1996] Rating: 6.1 (it should've been a 10.0)
anyways, all these should've been overturned for their ignorance...
good thing that fucknut Brent DiCrescenzo isn't in the mix anymore...autistic bastard!
|
|
|
Post by Castro on Feb 22, 2005 11:20:08 GMT -5
i've heard some shitty comments on atdi my bros friend has read in magazines like
"All atdi are trying to do is to be like blink 182"
"atdi are boring live"
dont know if they're were actually published or anythin
you get morons in life who dont know what they're talking about
|
|
|
Post by rivalhools on Feb 22, 2005 13:37:41 GMT -5
music journalism sucks anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Castro on Feb 22, 2005 14:27:43 GMT -5
yup. its for people who dont explore music. it basically says to them "buy this album"
|
|
|
Post by tremulant on Feb 22, 2005 16:29:50 GMT -5
Holy shit, those albums are all amazing. I wonder which albums got good reviews from them? How could anyone in the world think Deloused was anything but brilliant???
|
|
|
Post by motherprussia on Feb 24, 2005 2:04:06 GMT -5
pitchfork is notorious for doing this...they're a bunch of rich hipster kids who just sit around listening to indie music and feeling cool...sometimes i agree with them, but mostly i do not...
basically, they're assholes, and you should never taken them seriously
|
|
|
Post by tremulant on Feb 24, 2005 2:32:38 GMT -5
the only person I take seriously is YOU.
|
|
|
Post by Rubberneck on Feb 24, 2005 3:43:24 GMT -5
take anything from pitchfork with a grain of salt. very rarely does an album get a high rating. i don't care for their album ratings, but i must say i don't mind dropping by once in a while to read their cracks at certain bands. the bit they did on the upcoming NIN album cracked me up (and i'm an NIN fan).
|
|
|
Post by Castro on Feb 24, 2005 12:04:35 GMT -5
pitchfork is notorious for doing this...they're a bunch of rich hipster kids who just sit around listening to indie music and feeling cool...sometimes i agree with them, but mostly i do not... basically, they're assholes, and you should never taken them seriously you hit the nail on the head there
|
|
|
Post by soniktruth on Feb 24, 2005 14:35:17 GMT -5
fuck that, mother prussia would be an awesome album critic...I'LL DESIGNATE AN ALBUM FOR YOU TO CRITIQUE..
|
|
|
Post by motherprussia on Feb 24, 2005 16:44:20 GMT -5
uh oh
|
|
|
Post by soniktruth on Feb 25, 2005 16:40:37 GMT -5
El Guapo - The Burden of History EP
it's in my briefcase
i'll try to get futureheads for you
|
|
|
Post by sez on Feb 26, 2005 13:14:14 GMT -5
I dislike Franz Ferdinand.
|
|
|
Post by CoKeS on Feb 26, 2005 17:57:12 GMT -5
hey, dont diss music journalism, thats what I wanna do... and I'll do a damn fine job of it!
|
|
|
Post by soniktruth on Feb 28, 2005 15:23:01 GMT -5
hey, dont diss music journalism, thats what I wanna do... and I'll do a damn fine job of it! GIVE US AN ALBUM REVIEW YOU GOT FLOATING IN YOUR BRAIN!!
|
|
|
Post by MercurySolo on Feb 28, 2005 21:00:26 GMT -5
I used to want to do Music Journalism... then I figured I'd be a bad one 'cause it'd be hard for me to say a bad word towards a band I like whose new album is somewhat sub-par.
Pitchfork sucks. "Hey, I've never seen a vagina before in my life, what should I do? I KNOW!!!! I'll write for pitchfork and hate on bands that have actually seen bare... nekkid... chicks! :: drool and dried boogers :: " The only reviews I can read on their pages are the Radiohead ones, they love them.
|
|